Lieutenant Colonel Laurence Austine Waddell[1] F.L.S., L.L.D, M.Ch., I.M.S. RAI, F.R.A.S (1854–1938) was a British explorer, Professor of Tibetan, Professor of Chemistry and Pathology, British army surgeon,[2] collector in Tibet, philologist, amateur archeologist, Doctor of Laws, and author.
Contents |
Laurence Waddell was born on 29th May, 1854, and was the son of Rev. Thomas Clement Waddell, a Doctor of Divinity at Glasgow University and Jean Chapman, daughter of John Chapman of Banton, Stirlingshire.[3][4] Laurence Waddell obtained a Bachelor's degree in Medicine followed by a Masters degree in both Surgery and Chemistry at Glasgow University in 1878. His first job was as a resident surgeon near the university and was also the President of Glasgow University's Medical Society.[5] In 1880 Waddell joined the British Army and served as a medical officer for the Indian Medical Service (I.M.S), subsequently he was stationed in India and the Far East (Tibet, China and Burma). The following year he became a Professor of Chemistry and Pathology at the Medical College of Kolkata, India. While working in India, Waddell also studied Sanskrit for 4 years, and became a prominent philologist,[6] he also edited the Indian Medical Gazette, contributing zoological or medical articles such as "Are Venomous Snakes Autotoxic? An inquiry into the effect of serpent venom upon the serpents themselves" (1889) later becoming the "Assistant Sanitary Commissioner" under the government of India.[7]
After Waddell worked as a Professor of Chemistry and Pathology for 6 years, he became involved in military expeditions across Burma and Tibet.[8] Between 1885-1887 Waddell took part in the British expedition that annexed Upper Burma, which defeated Thibaw Min the last king of the Konbaung dynasty.[9] After his return from Burma Waddell was stationed in Darjeeling district, India, and was appointed Principal Medical Officer in 1888, as well as an officer for the Deputy Sanitary Commissionar. While stationed in Darjeeling, Waddell first took an interest in the colony of Tibetan monks who dwelt there and later became the first European to have acquired Tibetan manuscripts on Buddhism. The Times magazine in 1895 described Waddell as the "first European to have penetrated the esoteric Buddhism of Tibet".[10] His first publications were essays and articles on medicine and anthropology, most notably "The Birds of Sikkim" (1893) followed by "Some Ancient Indians Charms from the Tibetan" published in the Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland in 1895.[11] He also published several articles in the Bengal Asiatic Society's Journal between 1891 and 1899. In 1895 he obtained a doctorate in law.[12]
Waddell traveled extensively in India throughout the 1890s (including Sikkim and areas on the borders of Nepal and Tibet) and wrote about the Tibetan Buddhist religious practices he observed there. Stationed with the British army in Darjeeling, Waddell learned the Tibetan language and even visited Tibet several times secretly, in disguise. He was the cultural consultant on the 1903-1904 British invasion of Tibet led by Colonel Sir Francis Edward Younghusband, and was considered alongside Sir Charles Bell as one of the foremost authorities on Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism. Waddell studied archaeology and ethnology in-between his military assigments across India and Tibet, and his exploits in the Himalayas were published in his highly successful book Among the Himalayas (1899). Various archaeological excavations were also carried out and supervised by Waddell across India, including Pataliputra, of which he did not receive recognition of discovery until long after his death, in 1982, by the government of Bengal. His discoveries at Pataliputra were published in an official report "Discovery of the exact site of Asoka's classical capital of Pataliputra, the Palibothra of the Greeks" (1892).[13] During this period he also specialised in Buddhist antiquities and became a collector, between 1895-97 he published "Reports on collections of Indo-Scythian Buddhist Sculptures from the Swat Valley", in 1893 he also read a paper to the International Congress of Orientalists: "On some newly found Indo-Grecian Buddhistic Sculptures from the Swat Valley".[14] In 1895 Waddell published his book Buddhism of Tibet or Lamaism, which was one of the first works published in the west on Buddhism. Waddell had come across many ancient Tibetan manuscripts and published them, but soon left these studies because the Tibetan manuscripts contained no reference to any ancient civilization, which he had hoped to discover.[15] Waddell soon returned to England and briefly became Professor of Tibetan at the University College of London (1906-1908). Shortly after he retired and dedicated his life to writing.
In 1908, Waddell began to learn Sumerian.[16] Thus in his later career he turned to studying the ancient near east, especially Sumeria and dedicated his time to deciphering or translating ancient cuneiform tablets or seals, most notably including the Scheil dynastic tablet.[17] In 1911, Waddell published two entries in the Encyclopædia Britannica.[18] Waddell's son died having served in the World War.[19] By 1917, Waddell was fully retired and first started exclusively writing on Aryans, beginning in an article published in the Asiatic Review entitled "Aryan Origin of the World's Civilization".[20] From the 1920's Waddell published several works which attempted to prove an Aryan (i.e., Indo-European) origin of the alphabet and the appearance of Indo-European myth figures in ancient Near Eastern mythologies (e.g Hittite, Sumerian, Babylonian). The foundation of his argument is what he saw as a persistence of cult practices, religious symbols, mythological stories and figures, and god and hero names (based on etymology) throughout Western and Near Eastern civilizations, but also based his arguments on his deciphered Sumerian and Indus-Valley seals, and other archaeological findings. He is commemorated in the Giant Babax Babax waddelli.
Waddell's voluminious writings after his retirement were based on an attempt to prove the Sumerians (who he identified as Aryans) as the progenitors of other ancient civilizations, such as the Indus Valley Civilization and ancient Egyptians to "the classic greeks and Romans and Ancient Britons, to whom they [the Sumerians] passed on from hand to hand down the ages the torch of civilization".[21] He is most remembered however for his controversial translations, such as the Scheil dynastic tablet, the Bowl of Utu and Newton Stone.
The first Indus Valley or Harappan seal was published by Alexander Cunningham in 1872 however it was erroneously identified.[22] It was half a century later, in 1912, when more Indus Valley seals were discovered by J. Fleet, prompting an excavation campaign under Sir John Hubert Marshall in 1921–22, resulting in the discovery of the ancient civilization at Harappa (later including Mohenjo-daro). As ancient seals were discovered from the Indus Valley, Waddell in 1925 first attempted to decipher them and claimed they were of Sumerian origin in his Indo-Sumerian Seals Deciphered, arguing that they were evidence of Sumerian colonists who arrived there c. 3100 BC.[23] The work received mixed reaction among academics. The scholar George Aaron Barton published a lengthy article criticising Waddell's translations, convinced Waddell was mistaken.[24][25] The philologist Ralph Lilley Turner went further to dismiss Waddell's translations, calling them a "fantasy".[26] Frederick William Thomas however praised Waddell's research as a "wide accomplishment" while others considered his conclusions to at least be plausible.[27][28] Most modern scholars agree that the Sumerians traded with the peoples of the Indus Valley Civilization, as Harappan seals have been discovered across Mesopotamia.[29] The Sumerian trade link with the Indus Valley is further boosted by the appearance of Meluhha in ancient Sumerian literature and so Sumerian-Indus Valley trade links were probably existant. Waddell however argued further that the Indus Valley was colonised by Sumerians, who he identifed as being Aryans, even sharing the same kings. This theory has little, if any, scholarly support today however Barton noted in 1929 that Waddell's views on a Sumerian colony in the Indus Valley were shared to some degree with many other prominant scholars at the time, including notably the Assyriologist Archibald Sayce.[30]
Vaidyanatha Ayyar, an Indian scholar, building on Waddell's work, published in 1927 a book entitled The Sumerian Origin of the Laws of Manu.
Waddell placed the Proto-Indo-European or Proto-Aryan homeland in the Danube Valley, adjacent to the Black Sea from the 6th-4th millenium BC.[31] The archaeologist V. Gordon Childe also considered this location as the homeland of the Proto-Aryans (Proto-Indo-Europeans) after his research on the Danubian culture, especially its pottery.[32]
Today, the Danubian (or nearby Balkan) homeland hypothesis of the Proto-Indo-European still has scholary support.[33]
In his works Aryan Origin of the Alphabet and Sumer-Aryan Dictionary (1927) Waddell attempted to prove that the Sumerian language was of an Aryan (Indo-European) origin, linked most closely to a Proto-Indo-Hittite script. The non-Semitic origin of the Sumerian language was first established in the late 19th century by Julius Oppert and Henry Rawlinson from which many different theories were proposed as to its origin. Modern consensus is that Sumerian is a language isolate.
Waddell from 1917 (having first published the article "Aryan Origin of the World's Civilization") until his death was a proponent of hyperdiffusionism,[34] believing that many cultures and ancient civilizations were the product of Aryan Sumerian colonists such as the Indus Valley Civilization, Minoan Crete,[35] Phoenicia, Dynastic Egypt[36] and Bronze Age Britain.[37] His key work on Sumerian hyperdiffusionism was published in 1929, the full title printed as The makers of civilization in race & history, showing the rise of the Aryans or Sumerians, their origination & propagation of civilization, their extension of it to Egypt & Crete, personalities & achievements of their kings, historical originals of mythic gods & heroes with dates from the rise of civilization about 3380 B.C. reconstructed from Babylonian, Egyptian, Hittite, Indian & Gothic sources. In this work Waddell attempted to establish an Aryan (Indo-European) origin of the Sumerians, identifying them as Indo-Hittites or a branch of Anatolians who arrived in the Fertile Crescent during the late 4th millenium BC (ultimately having originated as a Proto-Indo-European society in the Danube Valley) where they founded the Sumerian kingship. Having established civilization in Sumeria, by Aryans, Waddell through archaeology, mythology and philology attempted to show ancient Sumerian colonies across parts of Europe (especially Crete and Britain), Egypt and India.
Grafton Elliot Smith who pioneered hyperdiffusionism (but of the ancient Egyptians) was an influential correspondent to Waddell.[38] A modified, less extreme form of Waddell's Sumerian hyperdiffusionism was supported by the archaeologist John Myres who argued for a Mesopotamian cultural origin for the ancient Greeks and also Oscar Montelius who suggested an ancient near eastern origin for the Aryans. There were many academic opponents however of the "diffusionist school" and Waddell's theories never became popular.[39]
Waddell's proposed Sumerian connection to Bronze Age Britain was revived by Christian O'Brien in 1983, who developed his theories.[40]
(for book descriptions see footnotes)